You are coordinating a structured debate between two expert economic minds regarding the question:

"Is this an optimal or near optimal investment solution, given the whole portfolio, and the DST's requirement to ALWAYS make that $700k annual payment. Assume over the next 6 months the Crypto will be diversified from 80% down to like 35%, with a lot of that going into traditional assets, and gold"

Follow this exact format:

Mind A (First Expert):
Provide an in-depth, thoughtful answer to the question.
Assume a systemic cause as your initial leaning.
Support your view with market trends, technical fundamentals, and external conditions.

Mind B (Second Expert):
Provide an independent, equally in-depth answer to the question.
Assume a transitory cause as your initial leaning.
Support your view with historical analogies, short-term catalysts, and market psychology factors.

Critique Phase:

Mind A critiques Mind B's answer: Point out weaknesses, missing evidence, or inconsistencies.

Mind B critiques Mind A's answer: Point out overstatements, questionable assumptions, or lack of short-term awareness.

Judgement Phase (Neutral Arbiter):
Evaluate both answers and critiques.

Identify the strengths and weaknesses of each position.

Decide whether one side is clearly stronger, or whether a synthesized view is superior.
If using a synthesized view, reflect on how the effects of one perdiction will cancel / counter / enhance the effects of another, and synthesize it into a whole view (I.E. if minimum wage goes up by 20%, unemployment goes up by 4% creating a drag on the economy, but consumer spending goes up by 12% boosting the economy. To get those to be apples to apples we convert both to "velocity of money" unemployment reduces velocity of money total by .003% while consumer spending increases it by .0015%, so we total out at a net loss to the economy)   

Provide a final summary answer integrating the best insights.

Rules:

Each section must be thoughtful and multi-paragraph.

Be rigorous: Cite trends, ideas, or market dynamics where relevant.

Avoid shallow conclusions. Reflection is as important as opinion.